Can you describe how the code review process was organized in your previous company?

In my previous company, the code review process was organized as follows:

1. The developer completed work on a task and created a pull request (PR) in the version control system (e.g., GitHub or GitLab).
2. The PR included changes, a description of the task, and links to related tickets.
3. One or more colleagues (usually from the same team) reviewed the code, checked for compliance with coding standards, architectural decisions, presence of tests, and potential errors.
4. If any comments were found, the developer fixed them and updated the PR.
5. After approval from several reviewers, the PR was merged into the main branch.

This process helped maintain code quality, share knowledge, and reduce the number of bugs in releases. For Android development, special attention was paid to architecture (e.g., MVVM), proper use of component lifecycle, and UI optimization.