Are there any design patterns that contradict the SOLID principles?

Yes, some design patterns can conflict with SOLID principles, especially if their application leads to violations of these principles.

For example:

• God Object — a pattern where one class contains too many responsibilities, violating the Single Responsibility Principle.
• Singleton — often criticized for violating the Dependency Inversion Principle and making testing difficult.
• Active Record — combines business logic and data access, which can violate separation of concerns.

Therefore, even well-known design patterns can conflict with SOLID if used without considering the context and good design principles. It is important to apply patterns consciously to avoid degrading the architecture.