How does your code review process go? How do you resolve disputes during review?

My code review process involves several stages:

1. The author creates a pull request with a description of the changes and objectives.
2. Reviewers check the code for compliance with requirements, readability, architecture, and tests.
3. Discussions of comments and suggestions take place directly within the version control system.

If disputes arise, I adhere to the following principles:

• I listen to arguments from both sides.
• I evaluate the impact on quality, performance, and support.
• If necessary, I involve a third party or team leader for an objective decision.
• It is important to maintain respect and focus on the code, not on personalities.

This approach helps improve code quality and maintain a healthy team atmosphere.